What It’s Like to Get a Double Mastectomy

This morning, Angelina Jolie revealed that she underwent a preventative double mastectomy because she tested positive for the gene BRCA1, which put her at an 87 percent risk for developing breast cancer and a 50 percent risk for developing ovarian cancer.

“Angelina Jolie is one of the most famous superstars in the world and is also notoriously private,” says Lindsay Avner, the founder and CEO of Bright Pink, a national nonprofit that focuses on the prevention and early detection of breast and ovarian cancers, while supporting high-risk individuals. “It says a lot about this issue that she’s willing to bring it to the forefront and encourage women to know their risk and their family history.”

The news hits close to home for Avner, and not just because she’s a breast and ovarian cancer awareness advocate—she underwent the same procedure to slash her breast cancer risk almost seven years ago, at the age of 23. At the time, she was the youngest person in the country to make the tough decision to remove two healthy breasts.

Avner’s grandmother and great grandmother both died from breast cancer, and her mother had her own double mastectomy after being diagnosed with the disease. When Avner found out that she had the gene BRCA1 at the age of 22, she started going to the doctor for regular clinical exams, mammograms, and MRIs.

“It really felt as if I was waiting to get cancer rather than doing anything to prevent it,” she says. “It was like I was just a ticking time bomb and it was only a time before cancer was coming for me.”

So in the spring of 2006, when she was getting ready for a night out with her college friends and realized that many of them had undergone breast surgeries for cosmetic reasons, she had an epiphany.

“I realized, ‘Wait—for a couple of scars I have an opportunity to not worry about this, to not have migraine headaches out of stress, to not feel this tremendous pressure to hurry up and get married tomorrow so I can have kids before cancer strikes,’” she says.

Just a few months later, in August 2006, she had both of her breasts removed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City—with the same doctor who had performed Avner’s mother’s double mastectomy.

“It’s so much more emotionally exhausting than it is about the physical pain,” she says (although, for the record, Avner says the initial procedure was pretty painful). “It’s about reconciling with parting with your breasts and the fears that everyone has: Will this change who I am? Will this change how I see myself?”

Just as with Jolie, Avner had a nipple-sparing mastectomy during which doctors placed tissue expanders in her chest to preserve her skin’s elasticity. Then, four months later, she had implants put in.

“This is a very personal decision that is not right for everyone, nor should everyone go out and get genetic testing,” says Avner. “It’s based on having a family history and putting a lot of thought into it and discussing the process with your doctor.”

So while you don’t necessarily need to go out and have genetic testing done this second, you can take other steps to evaluate your likelihood of developing breast and ovarian cancer—as well as what you can do about it. It’s important to note, for instance, that while a double mastectomy might be the right choice for some women, like Avner and Angelina Jolie, other women will have different needs, and should be aware of the different treatment options and preventative actions they might want to pursue.

Step one, regardless: Get informed. Bright Pink’s Assess Your Risk tool will help you see how your family history and various lifestyle factors—like whether you smoke and how often you work out—affect your odds of getting breast or ovarian cancer. Once you’re finished taking the interactive quiz, the site generates a personalized PDF you can print out and take to your doctor to start a conversation about your cancer risk.

“Knowledge is wonderful and awareness is important, but it’s action that saves lives,” says Avner. “Knowing this information only takes you halfway there—it’s about, what are you going to do with it? I think this is a really powerful opportunity, a moment we have to take all this awareness that’s being generated and empower women to really take action to develop a proactive approach to their health.”

photo: iStockphoto/Thinkstock

More From Women’s Health:
Breast Cancer Warriors
Should You Get a DNA Test?
7 Ways to Keep Your Breasts Healthy

javahut healthy feed

Attacks Your Liver Just Like Alcohol

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/05/07/the-sweetener-that-is-more-dangerous-than-alcohol.aspx?e_cid=20120507_DNL_art_

 

Sugar is Both a Fat and a Carb, and this Combo Drives World-Wide Obesity-Related Disease Rates

Sugar is the only calorie source that correlates with the increase in diabetes. In 1985, when the world-wide sugar consumption was 98 million tons, diabetes affected 30 million people. By 2010, sugar consumption had risen to 160 million tons, and global diabetes prevalence reached 346 million people. Overall, sugar is 50 times more potent than calories, in terms of causing diabetes. But why does it have this extraordinarily potent effect?

The answer lies in its unique structure. As just mentioned, it metabolizes as both fat and carbohydrate, and the reason for this is because it contains both glucose and fructose. These two sugars are not interchangeable, and your body processes each of them differently.

Sucrose (table sugar) is 50 percent glucose and 50 percent fructose. High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is anywhere from 42 to 55 percent fructose depending on which type is used. Glucose is the form of energy your body is designed to run on. Every cell in your body uses glucose for energy, and it’s metabolized in every organ of your body; about 20 percent of glucose is metabolized in your liver. Fructose, on the other hand, can only be metabolized by your liver, because your liver is the only organ that has the transporter for it.

Since all fructose gets shuttled to your liver, and, if you eat a typical Western-style diet, you consume high amounts of it, fructose ends up taxing and damaging your liver in the same way alcohol and other toxins do. In fact, fructose is virtually identical to alcohol with regards to the metabolic havoc it wreaks. According to Dr. Lustig, fructose is a “chronic, dose-dependent liver toxin.” And just like alcohol, fructose is metabolized directly into fat—not cellular energy, like glucose. So eating fructose is really like eating fat—it just gets stored in your fat cells, which leads to mitochondrial malfunction.

Not even fatty fruits like avocado or coconut have this effect, because your body treats them as either a fat or a carb—not both. Sugar is the only food that functions as both a fat and a carb simultaneously, and it is this combination of fat and carb that causes metabolic derangements and, subsequently, disease. So, please, don’t be fooled: when it comes to sugar, the claim you hear on TV, that “sugar is sugar” no matter what form it’s in, is a misstatement that can, quite literally, kill you—albeit slowly.

javahut healthy feed