What To Do If Nude Photos of You End Up Online

It’s basically your worst nightmare: You gave an ex a sexy photo, and now it’s on the web. In Brevard County, FL, the situation was so common that the local sheriff encouraged the state legislature to pass a law criminalizing “revenge porn.” Now, Florida has introduced a bill that would make it a felony to tag a naked picture of someone online without their consent.

The Sunshine State’s obviously not the only place where this happens—and your exes aren’t the only ones who could post potentially incriminating pictures, either. Abusive partners or peeping Toms could take photos without your knowledge, and hackers sometimes steal existing nude photos—all of which can result in involuntary porn. “I’m proud of Florida for their leadership in bringing the criminalization of involuntary porn into the mainstream discussion,” says Erica Johnstone, a partner at the San Francisco law firm Ritter, Costa, and Johnstone and cofounder of Without My Consent, a nonprofit that seeks to combat online invasions of privacy.

Here’s the thing: Regardless of where you live, you do have legal recourse if someone posts graphic images of you without your consent. “A lot of states do have criminal invasion of privacy laws that are on the books,” says Johnstone. Even in states that don’t, a civil lawsuit may help you get your photos taken down. Here, the steps Johnstone recommends taking to help you regain some control over the situation.

Preserve the evidence
While making another copy of the photo may be the last thing you feel like doing when you discover naked photos of yourself online, taking a screenshot or making a PDF of the page is vital if you want to pursue legal action, says Johnstone. “I hear a lot of stories, and what really helps is when the client can say, ‘This is what happened, this is how I know it happened, and here are the PDF documents that prove what I’m saying is true,’” says Johnstone. “We really need that kind of organization coming from clients.”

Find the right lawyer
If you go to a lawyer who tells you that they can’t help you because there aren’t any laws about involuntary porn in place, you’re talking to the wrong lawyer. “There probably aren’t a ton of attorneys yet who are familiar with this type of law,” says Johnstone. You want one who specializes in Internet privacy. If your friends and family members can’t recommend anyone, try contacting your state’s bar association for a referral.

Take steps to remove the photo
Oftentimes you’ll start with a letter to the creep who posted your photo. It will request a settlement agreement that will likely include a restraining agreement where the defendant promises to (a) take down the content, (b) never post it again, and (c) stay far away from you in the future. The settlement agreement should also include a copyright assignment that gives you ownership of the copyright to the photo (you can use this get the owners of any website to take it down). Most likely, the terms of the agreement will also provide for liquidated damages (i.e., money) if the guilty party breaks any of these promises.

File a police report
Johnstone recommends doing this at the same time you contact a lawyer so that police can enforce any criminal laws against involuntary porn that may exist in your state. While Johnstone says civil action is often very effective, criminal action can help give the person who posted your pics even more incentive to take them down.

Use Google to your advantage
If for some reason you’re unable to take down the content or get it removed, you’ll  want to use some search engine optimization strategies so that when people Google you, the incriminating photos show up as far down on the list as possible. “When you publish a lot of neutral to positive content online, it outweighs the negative content and pushes it off the first page of search results,” says Johnstone. So this would be the perfect time to spruce up your LinkedIn page, finally join Google+, and test recipes for that food blog you’ve been meaning to start.

photo: Wavebreak Media/Thinkstock

More From Women’s Health:
Men Who Cheat: Why Smart Men Do Such Sleazy Things
Protect Your Phone’s Private Parts: 4 Tips for Safer Sexting
Is He Keeping Secrets?

javahut healthy feed

Get This: Finding a Yoga Class Just Got Easier

Check out the list of links that should be on your radar today:

A new app from Lululemon helps you find different yoga classes near you. [Reuters]

Go ahead and play Text Twist: Word games are better than drugs at preventing cognitive decline. [TIME]

The new anti-street harassment PSAs in Philly are pretty amazing. [The Frisky]

Have high blood pressure while you’ve got a bun in the oven? It could mean you’re at risk for getting diabetes in the future. [EurekAlert]

Sorry, burger-and-fry lovers: People who eat a typically Western diet are more likely to die young. [Daily Mail]

Parents decide whether to give their kids vaccinations based on what their friends do. [Huffington Post]

A new study found that childbirth is just as traumatic for men as it is for women. Really, now… [The Cut]

Recent research finds that 29.8 percent of people crossing the street are too distracted to pay attention. Because, you know, who cares about oncoming traffic? [The Atlantic]

New tests have determined that horse meat is just gross, not unsafe. [AP]

photo: iStockphoto/Thinkstock

javahut healthy feed

Should I Worry About Cell Phone Radiation?

Name five adults you know who don’t have a cell phone. Not possible, right? We take owning them for granted—but there’s also continued concern about the potential health risks of cell phone radiation. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently opened an inquiry to determine if it should update its current policies and limits on exposure to cell phones’ radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

A phone’s Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency (RF) energy absorbed by the body when the phone is being used. The FCC’s current limit for public exposure is set at an SAR of 1.6 watts per kilogram, and all cell phone manufacturers have to comply. This standard has been in effect since 1996—long before cell phones became so pervasive. The FCC’s website states, “While the FCC has continuously monitored research and conferred with experts in this field, and is confident in its RF exposure guidelines and the soundness of the basis for its rules, it is a matter of good government to periodically reexamine regulations and their implementation.”

One thing that should make you say hmmm: Your cell phone manual contains a warning about a safe distance at which you should keep your phone from your body—and it’s usually a fraction of an inch. Who knew, right? And that’s the problem: Most of us hold our cell phones right up to our ear or against our leg in our pocket—potentially increasing the amount of RF energy that’s being delivered to our bodies to beyond the tested and touted amounts.

So what’s the general consensus of research on the dangers (or lack thereof) of cell phone radiation? That’s the thing: There really isn’t one. While some studies say cell phones don’t cause harm, others indicate that they do. For example, analyses of data from the large and multi-national Interphone study, published in 2010, drew mixed conclusions about whether long-term cell phone radiation exposure had any association with the risk of developing glioma, a type of brain tumor, and no causation was established.

In 2011, a group of 31 scientists from 14 countries met at the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to evaluate the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, such as the ones emitted by wireless communication devices. In the end, they classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” That means that, while not conclusive, the evidence was strong enough to say that there could be a risk. “The ‘possible’ means we can’t give assurance of safety because there is some signal of harm, and yet it’s not so definite,” says Jonathan Samet, MD, MS, director of the University of Southern California Institute for Global Health and chairman of the IARC working group.

But other researchers already say they feel certain that cell phones are a cause for concern: Henry Lai, PhD, a research professor in the University of Washington’s bioengineering department, has been studying radiation for more than three decades. He says that, while a causal relationship hasn’t been established yet, “the bottom line is that there is some evidence suggesting that they’re not safe—and this is something that we use everyday.”

No one’s entirely sure yet what the long-term effects are—cell phones haven’t been around long enough. (Some tumors, for example, can take upwards of three decades to develop.) Many of the studies also have flaws—for example, with self-reported data, people may not be able to remember how often they really used their cell phones. So unfortunately, the only clear consensus from experts is that more research needs to be done.

What it’s safe to assume: It’s going to take a while for experts to reach any sort of formal conclusion. For that reason, it’s probably best to be on the safe side and adjust your cell phone habits. Consider putting these four ways to reduce your exposure to radiation while using your cell into action.

The verdict: You don’t have to give up your cell phone, but it’s probably smart to make some habit tweaks—like investing in headphones and not sleeping with it next to your bed. When there’s this much on the line, it’s definitely better to be safe than sorry.

 

photo: iStockphoto/Thinkstock

More from Women’s Health:
Should I Worry About Driving with a Hands-Free Cell Phone?
Should I Worry About BPA?
Should I Worry About Superbugs?

javahut healthy feed

The Secret Ingredient to a Flatter Belly

Oil gets a bad rap, but you don’t have to completely banish it from your diet: In fact, eating certain kinds of vegetable oils might reduce abdominal fat and lower your risk for metabolic syndrome, according to a new study presented at the American Heart Association’s EPI/NPAM 2013 Scientific Sessions conference held in New Orleans last month. Metabolic syndrome is a pretty scary group of conditions—increased blood pressure, high blood sugar levels, excess abdominal body fat, and abnormal cholesterol levels—that can boost your risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.

A team of American and Canadian researchers put 121 participants—all of whom were at risk for metabolic syndrome—on a four-week, 2,000-calorie-per-day diet that included a daily smoothie containing 40 grams of one of five oils: canola oil, high-oleic canola oil, a flax/safflower oil blend, a corn/safflower oil blend, or high-oleic canola oil enriched with omega-3 fatty acids. They then performed a type of X-ray that can measure fat mass in different body regions—once at the beginning of the study, and once at the end of the four-week diet period. What they discovered: Those who consumed the smoothies containing canola or high-oleic canola oils trimmed their belly fat by an average of 1.6 percent more than those who had the flax/safflower oil blend. And those who had either the corn/safflower oil blend or the high-oleic canola oil enriched with omega-3s didn’t see any change in their abdominal fat at all.

Although it’s unclear why eating these oils might help you shed that pesky stomach pooch, researchers say it might come down to the oleic acid, a monounsaturated fatty acid found in both canola oil and high-oleic canola oil. “The oleic acid might just be metabolized differently,” says study author Penny Kris-Etherton, PhD, a distinguished professor of nutrition at Penn State University. Your body might process it in a way that burns some fat, making less available to be stored in your body, she says.

But this doesn’t mean you should go on a canola oil bender: You’ll want to add a reasonable amount to an otherwise-healthy diet to avoid taking in too many calories, says Kris-Etherton. To see some of the same benefits, she suggests consuming 40 grams (about 2.7 tablespoons) of canola oil or high-oleic canola oil each day as part of a 2,000 calorie, heart-healthy diet. That comes out to less than one tablespoon per meal.

To sneak more canola oil into your diet, try these delicious recipes:

BBQ Pork Tacos *contains 2/3 tsp canola oil per serving

photo: Helen Norman

Spiced Chicken with Dried Fruit *contains 2/3 tsp canola oil per serving

photo: Helen Norman

Apricot Shrimp Skewers *contains ½ tbsp + 2 tsp canola oil per serving

photo: Romulo Yanes

Pumpkin Waffles *contains ¾ tsp canola oil per serving

photo: John Kernick

Giant Mushrooms Stuffed with Greens and Mozzarella *contains ½ tbsp canola oil per serving

photo: John Kernick
top photo: iStockphoto/Thinkstock

More from WH:
Cut Your Diabetes Risk
5 Steps to a Healthy Heart
The Belly-Flattening Ab Workout

javahut healthy feed

Does Your Guy Have Baby Fever?

Men get a reputation for being baby-averse, but they may be more eager to have kids than you realize. In fact, childless men feel more depressed, sad, angry, and jealous of friends with kids than their female counterparts, according to a new survey conducted by Keele University in the UK.

The surveyors asked 108 childless adults (27 men and 81 women) how they feel about being kid-free. Fewer men than women said they want children (59 percent versus 63 percent). But of the guys who do want kids, half said they felt isolated and 36 percent reported feeling depressed. That’s not all: 56 percent said they were sad, and the same amount said they were jealous of dads. Fewer women who wanted children reported feeling the same way: 27 percent felt isolated, 27 percent were depressed, 43 percent were sad, and 47 percent felt jealous of others with kids.

Men tend to struggle with expressing emotion and often feel judged when they do, says study author Robin Hadley, a PhD candidate at the Centre for Social Gerontology at Keele University. The result: They may bottle up their feelings about fatherhood, which can make their emotions even more intense, she says.

Granted, this survey was pretty small—and conducted in the UK. So we asked Men’s Health Facebook followers to weigh in on the topic. The subject clearly touched a nerve—we got more than 200 responses. The overwhelming majority of men said they are content being childless for now as long as they have kids eventually (i.e., when they find the right woman and/or make enough money). But don’t take our word for it—here’s what the guys had to say:

Want to gauge your guy’s feelings about fatherhood? He probably won’t tear up at the sight of a stroller, says Joyce Marter, a licensed psychotherapist and CEO of Urban Balance, a Chicago-based counseling practice that’s offered pre-baby counseling since 2004. But if he talks a lot about his male friends with families, wanting to advance his career, or wanting to move into a bigger house, he could be suffering from the no-baby blues, says Marter. These symptoms are common among men who are anxious to have kids, she says.

Of course, you could just ask your guy directly about his paternal urges. Just make sure you do it at the right time—and in the right way, says Marter. While the baby question isn’t exactly first date material, it’s smart to see if your dude’s parenthood plans are in line with yours before you commit to an exclusive relationship. But to prevent a potential freak out, don’t ask him to father the two boys and two girls you see in your future. Instead, just ask, “Do you see yourself having a family down the road?” This casual, non-threatening approach will help you assess whether your parenting aspirations are in line with his. And if the response to our Facebook prompt is any indication, you can expect him to be pretty straightforward about his feelings on the topic.

photo: iStockphoto/Thinkstock

More from WH:
5 Signs He’ll Be a Great Father
When You Aren’t Sure You Want Kids
What You Should Know About Pregnancy

javahut healthy feed

Get This: Music is as Good as Sex

Check out the list of links that should be on your radar today:

Good news if Bruno Mars is the only man in your life right now: Listening to a song you like activates the same reward center in your brain as having sex. [The Telegraph]

Using a smartphone app can help you drop more pounds than logging your meals in an online food diary. Check out the best apps for weight loss[TIME]

All of that hype about how romcoms give you unrealistic expectations about love? Not true. In case you needed an excuse to watch Sleepless In Seattle… again… [Science Daily]

 

Portia de Rossi told Out magazine that she and partner Ellen Degeneres have no intention of adding kids to their family—seven months after Ellen said the same thing to Jay Leno. How many times must they repeat themselves? If you’re ambivalent about being a mom, here’s what you need to know[USA Today]

A new study out of Clemson University confirms what college students have been trying to ignore for decades: The balls you use to play beer pong are completely disgusting—as in, covered in salmonella, listeria, e. Coli, and staph that can end up in your beer disgusting. [The Daily Meal]

Back away from the computer: Interacting with your guy on too many different social media platforms could put a damper on your relationship. [LiveScience]

First, Justin Bieber  said that he hopes Anne Frank would have been a belieber. Now, after the completely understandable backlash to that statement, the museum created in Frank’s honor is standing up for Bieber. Don’t encourage him… [Gothamist]

A new study commissioned by a flip flop company finds that wearing flip flops to work is associated with having lower/non-existant stress levels.  You don’t say! [GlobeNewswire]

In case you have an extra $ 40,000 laying around, a bar in Maine is adding a $ 40K drink made with a ruby to its menu. [Newser]

photo: Ron Chapple Studios/Thinkstock

javahut healthy feed

The Simple Way to Breathe Easier

One of the best things you can do for your lungs (besides keeping them smoke-free)? Strike a pose. Practicing yoga regularly may help boost your lung function and capacity, according to a new study published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.

Researchers from Texas State University at San Marcos gathered 57 studies from four databases (the Alternative Health Watch, Physical Education Index, Medline, and SPORTdiscus), looking for ones that included the keywords “yoga,” “respiration,” and “pulmonary function.” Of those 57, researchers found nine studies that focused on pulmonary function in 609 individuals with healthy lungs. These studies measured how much a person can exhale in one second (something called forced expiratory volume, or FEV1) to determine lung health. After examining all nine studies, researchers found that all but one experiment indicated yoga was associated with better overall lung function. This was true even if the specific yoga techniques practiced–breathing, meditation, poses, etc.–varied in each study.

You might not realize it, but your lungs are like muscles in that they need to be exercised. Otherwise, they’ll become rigid, which forces you to take shorter breaths and can increase your risk of lung disease. Yoga requires you to breathe deeply to fully expand your lungs, which makes them more flexible and increases their ability to take in more air.

For improved pulmonary functions, researchers suggest practicing yoga for a minimum of two days a week, one hour each day. You should experience improved lung function in about 10 weeks. “It’s important that we inhale and exhale so that we keep our lungs functioning properly,” says lead study author Allison Abel, assistant director of total wellness at from Texas State University at San Marcos. This will help prevent problems such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis.

Better breathing isn’t the only benefit you’ll get from practicing yoga–it’s also a great way to fry fat, ease aches and pains, and make you feel more Zen. Whether you’re looking for an easy energy boost or want to build a leaner body, these yoga routines will keep your entire body fit–lungs and all.

Yoga Moves for a Pick-Me-Up

Burn Fat Faster with these Yoga Exercises

Get Rid of Cellulite

Shake Off Tummy Troubles (with yoga)

Yoga for Pain Relief

photo: Stockbyte/Thinkstock

More From Women’s Health:
Breathing Techniques: Less Anxiety and More Energy
Improve Your Breathing Techniques
Breathe Away Heartburn

javahut healthy feed

Is The New Morning Sickness Drug Safe?

If Kate Middleton’s pregnancy has taught us anything, it’s that, for some women, morning sickness is way more than just a pregnancy-related annoyance. In fact, about one percent of pregnant women suffer from symptoms that are so severe, they actually require medical treatment. Luckily for these women, the FDA just approved a drug to treat morning sickness—the first in more than 30 years.

The drug, Diclegis, should be available by the end of May. While you may not have heard of it before, it’s actually far from new: Diclegis was sold in the U.S. more than 50 years ago under a different brand name, Bendectin. Bendectin was approved by the FDA in 1956 for the treatment of vomiting and nausea due to pregnancy. However, many women who took Bendectin ultimately filed lawsuits against the manufacturer, claiming that it caused birth defects. The FDA continued to maintain that Bendectin was completely safe, but the lawsuits persisted. Swamped by legal costs and bad press, the manufacturer stopped making the drug in 1983.

As scary as this all may sound, there is no clinical evidence to suggest that Diclegis can harm a fetus. In fact, Diclegis has been tested extensively in the intervening 30 years. Two meta-analyses of existing research have concluded that it’s safe for a growing baby. In 1999, the FDA announced publicly that the drug was not discontinued for safety reasons. Now, a Canadian manufacturer has stepped in, tested the drug under a new name, and received FDA approval.

Many doctors have welcomed the development with open arms. “It’s a very well-studied medicine,” says Jeffrey Ecker, MD, an obstetrician at Massachusetts General Hospital and a member of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. “The available information does not suggest a risk.” In fact, the ACOG has recommended the two main ingredients in Diclegis—pyridoxine hydrochloride and doxylamine succinate—as a treatment for morning sickness for the past nine years.

Bottom line: All signs indicate that Diclegis is safe. Still not sure if this pill is right for you? This info will help you decide.

What is it?
Diclegis contains pyridoxine hydrochloride and doxylamine succinate. Pyridoxine is a form of vitamin B6, and doxylamine is an antihistamine (also found in certain allergy medicines). The tablets are delayed-release, so taking two at bedtime should help prevent the onset of morning sickness. If your symptoms are severe enough, you can take two more tablets throughout the day to keep your nausea in check. It’s not known why these ingredients work to reduce morning sickness, but in a recent study, it was found to be more effective than a placebo at reducing nausea and vomiting symptoms.

What are the possible side effects?
Drowsiness is the main one. Like all antihistamines, doxylamine is known to make you sleepy. It’s best to avoid driving or operating heavy machinery while on the medicine.

How do you know if you should take it?
If dietary and lifestyle changes aren’t working to ease your morning sickness, you may want to try taking vitamin B6 (one of the two ingredients in the drug) on its own. Ecker commonly prescribes 25 to 50 mg of B6, to be taken two to three times a day, to women with morning sickness. But if the B6 doesn’t help you, Diclegis may be your best bet.

“As with all medicines, folks that have had reactions to the ingredients shouldn’t take them,” says Ecker. If you know you have a B6 allergy or have reacted badly to anti-histamines in the past, skip this drug. For most people, though, these ingredients shouldn’t cause any problems—just easier mornings for moms-to-be.

photo: iStockphoto/Thinkstock

More From Women’s Health:
How to Deal With Severe Morning Sickness
Prenatal Yoga: Happy, Healthy Baby
What You Should Know About Pregnancy

javahut healthy feed

Breaking: 2 Explosions Reported at Boston Marathon

Witnesses say they heard at least two explosions near the finish line at the Boston Marathon just before 3 p.m., according to The Boston Herald. The paper reports that there have been at least a dozen injuries and several casualties. The blasts happened at about 2:50 p.m.

We’ll continue to update you on the situation as more details are revealed.

Donate to the American Red Cross

Register or Search the Red Cross’ Safe and Well Listings


 

javahut healthy feed

The Worst Breakfasts in America

Some foods go together like peanut butter and jelly. Like cheese and wine. Like eggs and…a glazed donut?! Select Massachusetts Dunkin’ Donut stores now carry a Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich, an insane concoction made of bacon and a pepper-fried egg between two halves of a glazed yeast donut.

The sandwich weighs in at 360 calories, 20 grams of fat and 13 grams of sugar—though Dunkin’ Donuts may be low-balling it with these stats. The company lists its glazed donut alone as having 260 calories and 12 grams of sugar, and it seems unlikely that everything else on the sandwich combined comes in at 100 calories and 1 gram of sugar.

As outrageous as the Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich may be, the scary thing is that it actually seems like a virtuous choice compared to some of the other offerings out there in the restaurant biz. Behold, some of the biggest diet disasters you can have for your morning meal—along with alternatives for when you want to eat breakfast out without doing so much damage.

THE DIET DISASTER:

Dunkin’ Donuts’ Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich
Calories: 360
Fat: 20 grams
Saturated fat: 8 grams
Sodium: 720 milligrams
Sugar: 13 grams

That’s 90 gourmet jelly beans’ worth of calories!

THE BETTER CHOICE:

Dunkin’ Donuts’ Bacon, Egg, and Cheese on an English Muffin Sandwich
Calories: 290
Fat: 10 grams
Saturated fat: 4.5 grams
Sodium: 700 milligrams
Sugar: 2 grams

 

THE DIET DISASTER:

Denny’s Grand Slamwich with Hash Browns
Calories: 1,530
Fat: 102 grams
Saturated fat: 45 grams
Sodium: 3,690 milligrams
Sugar: 11 grams

(Hash browns not pictured.)

You’re taking in the same amount of sodium as you would if you ate 17 servings of Chex Mix!

THE BETTER CHOICE:

Denny’s Fit Slam
Calories: 360
Fat: 10 grams
Saturated fat: 3 grams
Sodium: 820 milligrams
Sugar: 16 grams

 

 

THE DIET DISASTER:

Bob Evans’ Spinach, Bacon, and Tomato Biscuit Bowl
Calories: 1,013
Fat: 60 grams
Saturated fat: 29 grams
Sodium: 3,188 milligrams
Sugar: 7 grams

You could eat seven small Wendy’s Frosty treats for the amount of fat that’s in this dish.

THE BETTER CHOICE:

Bob Evans’ Garden Harvest Omelet
Calories: 478
Fat: 33 grams
Saturated fat: 14 grams
Sodium: 1,454 milligrams
Sugar: 5 grams

 

THE DIET DISASTER:


IHOP’s New York Cheesecake Pancakes

Calories: 1,100
Fat: 44 grams
Saturated fat: 21 grams
Sodium: 2,430 milligrams
Sugar: 53 grams

 

You might as well eat four Snickers bars—you’d take in the same number of calories.

THE BETTER CHOICE:

IHOP Original Buttermilk Pancakes (short stack)
Calories: 470
Fat: 15 grams
Saturated fat: 5 grams
Sodium: 1,590 milligrams
Sugar: 13 grams

 

 

THE DIET DISASTER:

Panera’s Pecan Roll
Calories: 740
Fat: 39 grams
Saturated fat: 12 grams
Sodium: 320 milligrams
Sugar: 50 grams

This has as much sugar as 11 fun-size Reese’s cups.

THE BETTER CHOICE:

Panera’s Chocolate Pastry
Calories: 410
Fat: 23 grams
Saturated fat: 14 grams
Sodium: 250 milligrams
Sugar: 18 grams

photo: Dunkin’ Donuts

More from Women’s Health:
Healthy Restaurant Eating
78 Ways to Cut Fat Calories from Your Diet
How Food Packaging Messes with Your Mind

javahut healthy feed